The Man Who Saw Everything – Deborah Levy

Recommend: No

There are good Deborah Levys (Hot Milk). There are confusing Deborah Levys (August Blue). There are forgettable Deborah Levys (Beautiful Mutants). This latest one I have read is called The Man Who Saw Everything and it’s a blend of all of the above.

Our narrator is Saul Adler. At the opening of the book he is in love with a younger woman called Jessica. Saul is a bit mopey and uninspired, unlike Jessica who is vibrant and determined to kick start her photography career. The pair lacks chemistry on the page but Levy styles the opening in a page-turner enough manner that it doesn’t matter it’s hard to take the two seriously as lovers. In fact, it’s almost part of the appeal. The relationship seems so unsuited that it’s sort of fun to watch it fall apart soon after we’re introduced to it.

Jessica and Saul’s break-up gives the impression quickly that the reader knows more than Saul. We can see that these guys had totally different motivations and desires in life, even while Saul’s all like “she’s my soulmate. I think this is deliberate by Levy. She’s showing us a man out of touch with the world around him. He’s a bit self-obsessed and, frankly, a bit boring. He’s going with the flow but it doesn’t click when that flow changes.

Before they break-up, Jessica convinces Saul to pose like a Beatle on Abbey Road as she photographs him. The way couples kill time on weekends can sound like hell on earth to their friends, and this is no exception. As Saul waits for Jessica on Abbey Road, he is hit by a car. This is where the plot really takes off.

Levy’s writing is good. I like Deborah Levy. I just wish her plots were more easily understood. She relies so heavily on repeated scenes and imagery to convey meaning. Each new variation on a repeated scene allows the reader to illicit a little bit more understanding of the character. That process of discovery is a valid way to structure a book. The ambiguity definitely increases my engagement with the plot because I am constantly trying to piece together a fuller picture of what is happening. The doublings also service the multiple timelines happening at once in this novel, connecting one moment to another 28 years later.

But I often end Levy’s novels unclear about what I was exactly meant to take away from each specific object of interest – all these motifs are planted deliberately by Levy, but why tinned pineapple, why the touch of one’s own hair? The circularity inherent in the plot means that I can’t say much of what happens after Saul is hit by the car on Abbey Road. Partly so I don’t ruin the suspense for others and partly because I didn’t always have a good grasp on what was happening.

Over time I’ve understood the most rewarding approach to Levy’s novels is to not question exactly why this particular doubling is being used, and try to understand instead what the general concept of doubling is trying to convey. In August Blue I struggled to understand the point: something about art and adopted family. The Man Who Saw Everything has a clearer overall message about the lasting impact of friendships and love, and was more enjoyable for it.

The journey wasn’t without meaning though, even though I often couldn’t see where I was going. I ended the book with fond feelings for Saul. The man is a bit lost, in the way we are all a bit lost. He is a bit lonely, in the way we are all a bit lonely. He’s had some adventures and made some memories but upon looking back, after a lifetime spent critically assessing history and its flaws, reflects on if his own choices were ever the right ones.



3 responses to “The Man Who Saw Everything – Deborah Levy”

  1. This is interesting, I’ve only read one Deborah Levy (Swimming Home) and I thought it was stunning, but yes, difficult. I studied it in uni, so the group conversations helped to get a grasp on the happenings and meanings, but even so, I guess looking back (especially after a few years) I couldn’t tell you exactly what happened in the book and what it all meant, but what I remember is the feelings elicited by the events and the prose: ‘the days were soft in the French riviera; the nights were hard and smelled of money’. Maybe in the end it doesn’t matter if you don’t follow it all the way, maybe you’re not entirely meant to? Maybe the author doesn’t even know exactly what’s happening and is sort of just writing a vibe? Who knows, but if it’s good it’s good. It’s always a fine line though, and very subjective, between ‘I don’t know what that was but I liked it’ and ‘what the hell was that?’

  2. I am very glad you bring up Swimming Home. This is what got me into Levy to begin with. I adored Swimming Home too. It was fun and light hearted but with just the right amount of ambiguity. I also have scenes I remember well from that book – the repeated visuals of her driving in the car around hairpin bends with her lover; the motif of her in the pool. The quote you selected is such good writing.

    I talked a bit more about Swimming Home here.
    https://www.aerowalsh.com/mountaindevil/?p=1043

    Would have loved to have attended a class where this was studied. I think I would have learnt a lot about motif.

    Sarah, I’ll be extremely interested in subsequent Levy texts. Personally, for me, none are as focused as Swimming Home (and even that wasn’t a very focused novel). Please pick one up for me over the next year and let me know.

    And if you can figure out any purpose to August Blue text me!!! I am still lost on that one…

  3. I like the twist of the boyfriend being hit by a car while posing on Abbey road.

    This review sounded like you enjoyed the book. Again, it’s a book that doesn’t really grab me and I would never look at normally so I think it is hard to appreciate the review. I think this review succinctly captured the key vibes though and I can see it against your other Levy ones.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *